Taking Up Cycling After Residential Relocation Built Environment Factors

Mariëlle Beenackers, S Foster, Carlijn Kamphuis, S Titze, M Divitini, M Knuiman, Frank van Lenthe, B Giles-Corti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: To successfully stimulate cycling, it is necessary to understand the factors that facilitate or inhibit cycling. Little is known about how changes in the neighborhood environment are related to changes in cycling behavior. Purpose: This study aimed to identify environmental determinants of the uptake of cycling after relocation. Methods: The RESIDential Environment Project (RESIDE) is a longitudinal natural experiment of people moving into new housing developments in Perth (Western Australia). Self-reported usual transport and recreational cycling behavior, as well as self-reported and objective built environmental factors were measured before and after residential relocation. Participants who did not usually cycle at baseline in 2003-2004 were included in the study. Logistic regression models were used to relate change Results: At baseline, 90% (n = 1289) of the participants did not cycle for transport and 86% (n = 1232) did not cycle for recreation. After relocation, 5% of the noncyclists took up transport-related cycling, and 7% took up recreational cycling. After full adjustment, the uptake of transport-related cycling was determined by an increase in objective residential density (OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.04, 2.26) and self-reported better access to parks (OR = 2.60, 95% CI = 1.58, 4.27) and other recreation Conclusions: Changes in the built environment may support the uptake of cycling among formerly noncycling adults. (Am J Prev Med 2012; 42(6): 610-615) (C) 2012 American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)610-615
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume42
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Cite this