Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Textbook Neoadjuvant Outcome—Novel Composite Measure of Oncological Outcomes among Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Multimodal Treatment

  • Zuzanna Pelc
  • , Katarzyna Sędłak
  • , Magdalena Leśniewska
  • , Katarzyna Mielniczek
  • , Katarzyna Chawrylak
  • , Magdalena Skórzewska
  • , Tomasz Ciszewski
  • , Joanna Czechowska
  • , Agata Kiszczyńska
  • , Bas P.L. Wijnhoven
  • , Johanna W. Van Sandick
  • , Ines Gockel
  • , Suzanne S. Gisbertz
  • , Guillaume Piessen
  • , Clarisse Eveno
  • , Maria Bencivenga
  • , Giovanni De Manzoni
  • , Gian Luca Baiocchi
  • , Paolo Morgagni
  • , Riccardo Rosati
  • Uberto Fumagalli Romario, Andrew Davies, Yutaka Endo, Timothy M. Pawlik, Franco Roviello, Christiane Bruns, Wojciech P. Polkowski, Karol Rawicz-Pruszyński*
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Medical University of Lublin
  • Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
  • University Hospital Leipzig
  • University of Amsterdam
  • Amsterdam UMC
  • Université de Lille
  • University of Verona
  • University of Brescia
  • Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital
  • Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
  • IRCCS Istituto Europeo di Oncologia - Milano
  • Ohio State University
  • University of Siena
  • University Hospital Cologne

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
22 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The incidence of gastric cancer (GC) is expected to increase to 1.77 million cases by 2040. To improve treatment outcomes, GC patients are increasingly treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) prior to curative-intent resection. Although NAC enhances locoregional control and comprehensive patient care, survival rates remain poor, and further investigations should establish outcomes assessment of current clinical pathways. Individually assessed parameters have served as benchmarks for treatment quality in the past decades. The Outcome4Medicine Consensus Conference underscores the inadequacy of isolated metrics, leading to increased recognition and adoption of composite measures. One of the most simple and comprehensive is the “All or None” method, which refers to an approach where a specific set of criteria must be fulfilled for an individual to achieve the overall measure. This narrative review aims to present the rationale for the implementation of a novel composite measure, Textbook Neoadjuvant Outcome (TNO). TNO integrates five objective and well-established components: Treatment Toxicity, Laboratory Tests, Imaging, Time to Surgery, and Nutrition. It represents a desired, multidisciplinary care and hospitalization of GC patients undergoing NAC to identify the treatment- and patient-related data required to establish high-quality oncological care further. A key strength of this narrative review is the clinical feasibility and research background supporting the implementation of the first and novel composite measure representing the “ideal” and holistic care among patients with locally advanced esophago-gastric junction (EGJ) and GC in the preoperative period after NAC. Further analysis will correlate clinical outcomes with the prognostic factors evaluated within the TNO framework.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1721
JournalCancers
Volume16
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright: © 2024 by the authors.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Textbook Neoadjuvant Outcome—Novel Composite Measure of Oncological Outcomes among Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Multimodal Treatment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this