Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Thalamus involvement in genetic frontotemporal dementia assessed using structural and diffusion MRI: A GENFI study

  • Sonja Soskic
  • , Henry F.J. Tregidgo
  • , Genetic Frontotemporal Initiative (GENFI)
  • , Emily G. Todd
  • , Arabella Bouzigues
  • , David M. Cash
  • , Lucy L. Russell
  • , David L. Thomas
  • , Ian B. Malone
  • , Phoebe H. Foster
  • , Eve Ferry-Bolder
  • , John C. Van Swieten
  • , Lize C. Jiskoot
  • , Harro Seelaar
  • , Raquel Sanchez-Valle
  • , Robert Laforce
  • , Caroline Graff
  • , Daniela Galimberti
  • , Rik Vandenberghe
  • , Alexandre De Mendonça
  • Pietro Tiraboschi, Isabel Santana, Alexander Gerhard, Johannes Levin, Benedetta Nacmias, Markus Otto, Maxime Bertoux, Thibaud Lebouvier, Simon Ducharme, Christopher R. Butler, Isabelle Le Ber, Elizabeth C. Finger, Maria Carmela Tartaglia, Mario Masellis, James B. Rowe, Matthis Synofzik, Fermin Moreno, Barbara Borroni, Daniel C. Alexander, Juan Eugenio Iglesias, Jonathan D. Rohrer, Martina Bocchetta*
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University College London
  • University of Barcelona
  • Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Université Laval
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Karolinska University Hospital
  • IRCCS Fondazione Ca'Granda – Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico - Milano
  • University of Milan
  • KU Leuven
  • University Hospitals Leuven
  • Leuven Brain Institute
  • Faculdade de Medicina de Lisboa
  • IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta - Milano
  • University of Coimbra
  • University of Manchester
  • University of Duisburg-Essen
  • Klinikum Hochsauerland
  • Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
  • German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy)
  • University of Florence
  • IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi - Milano
  • Ulm University
  • Université de Lille
  • Douglas Mental Health University Institute
  • McConnell Brain Imaging Centre
  • University of Oxford
  • Imperial College London
  • Sorbonne Université
  • Western University
  • University of Toronto
  • University of Tübingen
  • Hospital Universitario Donostia
  • Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Biodonostia
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  • University of Brescia
  • IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli - Brescia
  • Harvard University
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Brunel University London

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
14 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Thalamic subregions are commonly, but variably, affected by different forms of frontotemporal dementia. We aimed to better characterize thalamic subregional involvement in genetic frontotemporal dementia with a recently published thalamus segmentation tool that utilizes structural and diffusion MRI, offering additional assessment of mean diffusivity and a more fine-grained analysis of the pulvinar specifically compared to previous studies. Using this tool, we performed thalamus segmentations in MRI scans from C9orf72, GRN and MAPT mutation carriers and mutation non-carriers with suitable 3-Tesla MRI cross-sectional data from the GENetic Frontotemporal dementia Initiative. Mutation carriers were divided according to their genetic group and Clinical Dementia Rating® Dementia Staging Instrument plus National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Behaviour and Language Domains global score (0 or 0.5: presymptomatic/prodromal stage, 1 or higher: symptomatic stage). Following stringent quality control and harmonization across sites and scanners, we compared volumes and mean diffusivity values of thalamic subregions in C9orf72 (47 presymptomatic, 10 symptomatic), GRN (57 presymptomatic, 11 symptomatic) and MAPT (31 presymptomatic, 12 symptomatic) mutation carriers to those in 109 mutation non-carriers with analyses of covariance including age and sex (and total intracranial volume for volumetric comparisons) as covariates. Presymptomatic C9orf72 expansion carriers showed smaller volumes (3-8% difference from non-carriers) and higher mean diffusivity (2-5% difference from non-carriers) for several thalamic subregions, including all pulvinar subdivisions. We found subtly larger volumes of the ventral anterior subregion and the non-medial pulvinar (3% difference from non-carriers for both) in presymptomatic GRN mutation carriers, and of the anteroventral subregion (5% difference from non-carriers) in presymptomatic MAPT mutation carriers. Symptomatic mutation carriers in all three genetic groups showed significantly smaller volumes and widespread higher mean diffusivity of thalamic subregions compared with non-carriers, which were overall most prominent in subregions involved in associative and limbic functions (the midline, medial pulvinar, anteroventral, mediodorsal, laterodorsal and lateral posterior subregions). Notably smaller volume (12-23% difference from non-carriers) and higher mean diffusivity (16-23% difference from non-carriers) of the most medial part of the medial pulvinar was a shared feature across the three genetic groups at the symptomatic stage. Overall, our study confirms that thalamic subregions are affected in genetic frontotemporal dementia and identifies prominent involvement of the most medial part of the medial pulvinar as a potential unifying feature in the variable pattern of thalamic subregional involvement across the main genetic groups.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberfcaf420
JournalBrain Communications
Volume7
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Thalamus involvement in genetic frontotemporal dementia assessed using structural and diffusion MRI: A GENFI study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this