The bare necessities? A realist review of necessity argumentations used in health care coverage decisions

Tineke Vliek; Antoinette de Bont; Bert Boer

doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.04.011

The bare necessities? A realist review of necessity argumentations used in health care coverage decisions

Tineke Vliek, Antoinette de Bont, Bert Boer

Health Care Governance (HCG)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

22 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Twenty argumentations pertaining to necessity of coverage of care are in use. Twelve of these are used either in favour of or against coverage, not both. Patients or the public putting the issue on the agenda favours coverage. Policy makers and insurance companies only use half of the argumentations. All argumentations are used by patients, authors, the public and/or the media.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	731-744
Number of pages	14
Journal	Health Policy
Volume	121
Issue number	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.04.011
Publication status	Published - 2017

Access to Document

10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.04.011

1-s2.0-S0168851017301203-main.pdfFinal published version, 2.42 MB

http://hdl.handle.net/1765/100772

Cite this

@article{05b1f73348814aa7bc7865c3ea44d4bb,

title = "The bare necessities? A realist review of necessity argumentations used in health care coverage decisions",

abstract = "Twenty argumentations pertaining to necessity of coverage of care are in use. Twelve of these are used either in favour of or against coverage, not both. Patients or the public putting the issue on the agenda favours coverage. Policy makers and insurance companies only use half of the argumentations. All argumentations are used by patients, authors, the public and/or the media.",

author = "Tineke Vliek and {de Bont}, Antoinette and Bert Boer",

year = "2017",

doi = "10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.04.011",

language = "English",

volume = "121",

pages = "731--744",

journal = "Health Policy",

issn = "0168-8510",

publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The bare necessities? A realist review of necessity argumentations used in health care coverage decisions

AU - Vliek, Tineke

AU - de Bont, Antoinette

AU - Boer, Bert

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Twenty argumentations pertaining to necessity of coverage of care are in use. Twelve of these are used either in favour of or against coverage, not both. Patients or the public putting the issue on the agenda favours coverage. Policy makers and insurance companies only use half of the argumentations. All argumentations are used by patients, authors, the public and/or the media.

AB - Twenty argumentations pertaining to necessity of coverage of care are in use. Twelve of these are used either in favour of or against coverage, not both. Patients or the public putting the issue on the agenda favours coverage. Policy makers and insurance companies only use half of the argumentations. All argumentations are used by patients, authors, the public and/or the media.

U2 - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.04.011

DO - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.04.011

M3 - Article

SN - 0168-8510

VL - 121

SP - 731

EP - 744

JO - Health Policy

JF - Health Policy

IS - 7

ER -

The bare necessities? A realist review of necessity argumentations used in health care coverage decisions

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this