Abstract
This article addresses the question: 'In what ways have nudging and other behavioural techniques entered the realm of policymaking for public health and what does that mean for the way contemporary society is governed?' In our genealogy of Dutch public health policy, we have identified four periods: 'rational persuasion/individual responsibility' ('70s), 'welfarist emancipation' ('80s), 'neo-liberal regulation' ('90s), and 'management of choice' (now). We show how a different type of technique, which we call 'mindpolitics', has slowly complemented the biopolitics of public hygiene and health care. We argue that to think in terms of biopolitics today means to think of its relation to a world in which public health is managed through architecture of choice and the way individuals are nudged into making better decisions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 138-159 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Social Theory and Health |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - May 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Research programs
- ESL – Diversen Oud
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The birth of mindpolitics: Understanding nudging in public health policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver