The capability set for work: development and validation of a new questionnaire

FI Abma, S Brouwer, HJ de Vries, I Arends, Suzan Robroek, MPJ Cuijpers, GJ van der Wilt, U Bultmann, JJL van der Klink

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

75 Citations (Scopus)
29 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to develop a questionnaire to measure work capabilities based on Amartya Sen's capability approach and evaluate its validity. Methods The development of the questionnaire was based on a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods: interviews, literature study, and an expert meeting. Additionally, in a survey, the validity was evaluated by means of hypotheses testing (using correlations and regression analyses). Results The questionnaire consists of a set of seven capability aspects for work. For each aspect, it is determined whether it is part of a worker's capability set, ie, when the aspect is considered valuable, is enabled in work, and is realized. The capability set was significantly correlated with work role functioning-flexibility demands (-0,187), work ability (-0.304), work performance (-0.282), worked hours (-0.073), sickness absence (yes/no) (0.098), and sickness absence days (0.105). The capability set and the overall capability item are significantly associated with all work outcomes (P<0.010). Conclusions The new capability set for work questionnaire appears to be a valid instrument to measure work capabilities. The questionnaire is unique because the items include the valued aspects of work and incorporate whether a worker is able to achieve what (s)he values in his/her work. The questionnaire can be used to evaluate the capability set of workers in organizations to identify aspects that need to be addressed in interventions.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)34-42
Number of pages9
JournalScandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Research programs

  • EMC NIHES-02-65-02

Cite this