TY - JOUR
T1 - The Changing Face of cN0M0 Prostate Cancer Being Found With pN+ After Surgery in the Contemporary Era
T2 - Results of an International European Survey on Disease Management
AU - Sacco, Matteo
AU - Gandaglia, Giorgio
AU - Aas, Kirsti
AU - YAU Prostate Cancer Working Group
AU - Ceci, Francesco
AU - Chiu, Peter
AU - Fankhauser, Christian D
AU - Fournier, Georges
AU - Heiddeger, Isabel
AU - Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
AU - Kesch, Claudia
AU - Maggi, Martina
AU - Martini, Alberto
AU - Olivier, Jonathan
AU - Ploussard, Guillaume
AU - Preisser, Felix
AU - Puche-Sanz, Ignacio
AU - Rajwa, Pawel
AU - Soeterik, Timo
AU - Thibault, Constance
AU - Valerio, Massimo
AU - van den Bergh, Roderick C N
AU - Zattoni, Fabio
AU - Rivas, Juan Gómez
AU - Moschini, Marco
AU - Gillessen, Silke
AU - Bossi, Alberto
AU - Gontero, Paolo
AU - Marra, Giancarlo
N1 - Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - Introduction: The urological community's opinion over the management of men being found with pathologically positive nodes (pN+) following radical prostatectomy (RP) performed with curative intent after preoperative negative conventional staging (cN0M0) has never been assessed. This remains crucial, especially considering the advent of novel imaging modalities. Our aim was to investigate the current opinion on management of pN+ cN0M0 prostate cancer (PCa) in the European urological community. Methods: Following validation, a 31-item survey, complying with the Cherries checklist, was distributed using a web link from December 2021 to April 2022 to 10 urological societies mailing list. Social media (Twitter, Facebook) were also used. Results: We received 253 replies. The majority were Urologists (96.8%), younger than 60 (90.5%); 5.2% did not have access to PET-scans; 78.9% believed pN+ is a multifaceted category; 10-years CSS was marked as 71 to 95% by 17.5%. Gold standard management was stated not being ADT by 80.8% and being RT±ADT by 52.3%. Early sRT±ADT was considered an option vs. aRT±ADT by 72.4%. In case of BCR 71% would perform and decide management based on PSMA-PET whilst 3.7% would not perform PSMA-PET. pN+ management is still unclear for 77.1%. On multivariate analysis PSMA-PET availability related to a lower and higher likelihood of considering aRT±ADT as standard and of considering early salvage versus aRT respectively (P < .05). Conclusions: The Urological community has an acceptable awareness of pN+ disease and management, although it may overestimate disease aggressiveness. The majority consider pN+ PCa as a multifaceted category and rely on a risk-adapted approach. Expectant compared to immediate upfront management and new imaging modalities are increasingly considered.
AB - Introduction: The urological community's opinion over the management of men being found with pathologically positive nodes (pN+) following radical prostatectomy (RP) performed with curative intent after preoperative negative conventional staging (cN0M0) has never been assessed. This remains crucial, especially considering the advent of novel imaging modalities. Our aim was to investigate the current opinion on management of pN+ cN0M0 prostate cancer (PCa) in the European urological community. Methods: Following validation, a 31-item survey, complying with the Cherries checklist, was distributed using a web link from December 2021 to April 2022 to 10 urological societies mailing list. Social media (Twitter, Facebook) were also used. Results: We received 253 replies. The majority were Urologists (96.8%), younger than 60 (90.5%); 5.2% did not have access to PET-scans; 78.9% believed pN+ is a multifaceted category; 10-years CSS was marked as 71 to 95% by 17.5%. Gold standard management was stated not being ADT by 80.8% and being RT±ADT by 52.3%. Early sRT±ADT was considered an option vs. aRT±ADT by 72.4%. In case of BCR 71% would perform and decide management based on PSMA-PET whilst 3.7% would not perform PSMA-PET. pN+ management is still unclear for 77.1%. On multivariate analysis PSMA-PET availability related to a lower and higher likelihood of considering aRT±ADT as standard and of considering early salvage versus aRT respectively (P < .05). Conclusions: The Urological community has an acceptable awareness of pN+ disease and management, although it may overestimate disease aggressiveness. The majority consider pN+ PCa as a multifaceted category and rely on a risk-adapted approach. Expectant compared to immediate upfront management and new imaging modalities are increasingly considered.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149765859&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.11.012
DO - 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.11.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 36609130
SN - 1558-7673
VL - 21
SP - 416.e1-416.e10
JO - Clinical Genitourinary Cancer
JF - Clinical Genitourinary Cancer
IS - 3
ER -