The Diagnostic Value of Language Screening in Primary Progressive Aphasia: Validation and Application of the Sydney Language Battery

Nikki Janssen*, Ardi Roelofs, Esther van den Berg, Willem S. Eikelboom, Meike A. Holleman, Dymphie M.J.M. in de Braek, Olivier Piguet, Vitória Piai, Roy P.C. Kessels

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: The three variants of primary progressive aphasia (PPA) differ in clinical presentation, underlying brain pathology, and clinical course, which stresses the need for early differentiation. However, brief cognitive tests that validly distinguish between all PPA variants are lacking. The Sydney Language Battery (SYDBAT) is a promising screening instrument that can be used as a first step in a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment to distinguish PPA subtypes, but evidence on its validity and reliability is to date limited. In the current study, the validation and diagnostic value of the SYDBAT are described for discriminating PPA subtypes as well as distinguishing PPA from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or Alzheimer’s dementia (AD). Method: Forty-five patients with PPA (13 with semantic PPA, 20 with logopenic PPA, and 12 with nonfluent/agrammatic PPA), 25 MCI patients, 13 AD patients, and 50 cognitively unimpaired controls were included in this study. Both patients and controls completed the SYDBAT-NL (Dutch version). Performance on and predictive ability of the four subtests (i.e., Naming, Word Comprehension, Repetition, and Semantic Association) were assessed. In addition, construct validity and internal consistency were examined. Results: Different SYDBAT performance patterns were found across PPA and non-PPA patient groups. While a discriminant function analysis based on SYDBAT subtest scores could predict PPA subtype with 78% accuracy, it was more difficult to disentangle PPA from non-PPA patients based on SYDBAT scores alone. For assisting in clinical interpretation, simple rules were set up and translated into a diagnostic decision tree for subtyping PPA, which was capable of diagnosing a large proportion of the cases. Satisfying validity and reliability measures were found. Conclusions: The SYDBAT is an easy-to-use and promising screen for assessing single-word language processes, which may contribute to the differential diagnostic process of PPA and the assessment of language impairment in MCI and AD. It can be easily implemented for initial screening of patients in a memory clinic.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)200-214
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume65
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Ilja Klabbers-Helsper for her help in selecting and evaluating patients and William M. van der Veld for his statistical advice. This study was funded by the Gravitation Grant 024.001.006 of the Language in Interaction Consortium from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) awarded to R. P. C. K., and A. R. O. P. is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Senior Research Fellowship (APP1103258). V. P. is supported by a grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) under award number 451-17-003.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Diagnostic Value of Language Screening in Primary Progressive Aphasia: Validation and Application of the Sydney Language Battery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this