Abstract
Purpose:
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) affects the appearance of spine and trunk. The Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (SAQ) assesses the perception of appearance in AIS patients. The aim of this study is to translate and culturally adapt the recommended short version of the SAQ into Dutch and to test its measurement properties.
Methods:
A Dutch SAQ (14-item; appearance and expectations domains) was developed following guidelines for translation and cross-cultural adaptation. The COSMIN Study Design checklist was used for measurement properties evaluation. In this multicenter study, the Dutch SAQ, SRS-22R and NPRS (back pain) were administered to 113 AIS patients (aged 15.4 years [SD 2.2], 21.2% male). Floor and ceiling effects were evaluated for content analysis. For reliability, internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) and test–retest reliability (ICC; n = 34) were evaluated. Predefined hypotheses of relationships with other questionnaires and between subgroups based on scoliosis severity (radiological and clinical) were tested for construct validity. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed to investigate the validity of the underlying structure of this 14-item questionnaire.
Results:
No floor and ceiling effects were found for domains and total scores. Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.84 to 0.89. ICCs varied from 0.76 to 0.77. For construct validity, 89% (8/9) of the predefined hypotheses were confirmed. Significant higher scores for the appearance domain were found for subgroups based on radiological (Cobb angle; > 25.0°) and clinical outcomes. (Angle of Trunk Rotation; > 9.0°). A two-factor structure was found (EV 5.13; 36.63% explained variance).
Conclusion:
The Dutch SAQ is an adequate, valid and reliable instrument to evaluate patients’ perception of appearance in AIS.
Level of evidence:
Level I—diagnostic studies.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 79-87 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Spine Deformity |
Volume | 12 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:Dineke G. van de Fliert: none related to this study. Tom P. C. Schlösser: none related to this study. Diederik H. R. Kempen: none related to this study. Joost P. H. J. Rutges: none related to this study. Pepijn Bisseling: none related to this study. Marinus de Kleuver: received a grant from ZonMw. Miranda L. van Hooff: received a grant from ZonMw.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).