Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Dutch Working Party on Antibiotic Policy (SWAB) guideline for the approach to suspected antibiotic allergy

  • Roos Wijnakker*
  • , Maurits S. van Maaren
  • , Lonneke G.M. Bode
  • , Maja Bulatovic
  • , Bart J.C. Hendriks
  • , Masja C.M. Loogman
  • , Suzanne P.M. Lutgens
  • , Ananja Middel
  • , Chris M.G. Nieuwhof
  • , Eveline E. Roelofsen
  • , Jan W. Schoones
  • , Kim C.E. Sigaloff
  • , Aline B. Sprikkelman
  • , Lieke M.M. de Vrankrijker
  • , Mark G.J. de Boer
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Leiden University Medical Centre
  • Utrecht University
  • Dutch college of General Practitioners (NHG)
  • Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis
  • University Medical Centre Groningen
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre
  • Amsterdam UMC
  • Haaglanden Medisch Centrum

Research output: Contribution to journalShort surveyAcademicpeer-review

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Prudent handling of reported antibiotic allergies is an important aspect of antibiotic stewardship. The Dutch Working Party on Antibiotic Policy (SWAB) constituted a multidisciplinary expert committee to provide evidence-based recommendations for bedside decision-making in antibiotic therapy in patients that report an antibiotic allergy. Methods: The guideline committee generated 12 key questions, most of which were population, intervention, comparison, and outcome questions relevant to both children and adults with suspected antibiotic allergies. For each question, a systematic literature search was performed and reviewed for the best available evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The quality of evidence was graded from very low to high, and recommendations were formulated in structured discussions as strong or weak. Results: Sixty recommendations were provided for suspected allergy to β-lactam antibiotics (BLAs) and non–β-lactam antibiotics. Owing to the absence of randomized controlled trials in this field, the underlying evidence was predominantly graded as low or very low. Available data support that a detailed allergy history should always be performed and critically appraised. When cross-allergy between BLA groups is not to be expected due to the absence of molecular similarity of the side chains, the patient can be safely exposed to the alternative BLA. An exception to this rule is severe delayed-type reactions in which re-exposure to a BLA should only be considered after consultation with a multidisciplinary team. Conclusions: Accumulated scientific data now support a more liberal approach that better balances the benefits of treatment with first choice and usually smaller spectrum antibiotics with appropriate avoidance of antibiotics in case of a truly high risk of a (severe) allergic reaction. In The Netherlands, a formal guideline was developed that provides recommendations for the approach toward suspected allergy to BLA and frequently used non–β-lactam antibiotics, thereby strongly supporting antimicrobial stewardship.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)863-875
Number of pages13
JournalClinical Microbiology and Infection
Volume29
Issue number7
Early online date15 Apr 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Dutch Working Party on Antibiotic Policy (SWAB) guideline for the approach to suspected antibiotic allergy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this