The Effect of Auditor Style on Reporting Quality: Evidence from Germany

Vlad Andrei Porumb, Abe De Jong, Carel Huijgen, Teye Marra, Jan Van Dalen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
31 Downloads (Pure)


This paper examines whether the ‘style’ of individual auditors influences financial reporting quality in Germany. Audit quality in Germany should be uniformly high, because of strong reputational needs, strict controls on operating procedures, and quality enforcement mechanisms. An audit partner's style should not affect this quality level. However, our results do not support this expectation. Exploiting a unique dataset comprising the names of the audit engagement and review partners of listed German companies, we find that audit engagement partners in Germany have a significant influence on audit quality, beyond firm- and office-level factors. In contrast, audit review partners do not have a consistent significant influence on audit quality. We measure audit quality by the level of a firm's abnormal accruals and its propensity to meet or beat an earnings target. We also find that the 2005 adoption of a new audit quality enforcement system that includes ‘naming and shaming’ does not reduce the influence of audit partner style on financial reporting quality.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-26
Number of pages26
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 7 Mar 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Accounting Foundation, The University of Sydney


Dive into the research topics of 'The Effect of Auditor Style on Reporting Quality: Evidence from Germany'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this