Abstract
Introduction:
There is a great need to increase the organ donor pool, particularly for living donors. This study analyses the difference in post-living donation kidney function according to predonation characteristics of age, genetic relationship with the recipient, sex, ethnicity, and Body Mass Index (BMI).
Methods:
Retrospective single centre analysis of the trajectory of estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) post-living kidney donation, as a measure of kidney function. Mean eGFR of the different groups was compared at 6 months and during the 60 months follow up.
Results:
Mean age was 46 ± 13 years, 57% were female, and 60% Caucasian. Mean BMI was 27 ± 5 kg/m2, with more than a quarter of the cohort having a BMI > 30 (26%), and the majority of the donors genetically related to their recipients (56%). The higher decline rate in eGFR was at 6 months after donation, with female sex, non-Caucasian ethnicity, and age lower than 60 years being independently associated with higher recovery in kidney function (p < 0.05). In the 60 months follow up, older age, genetic relationship with the recipient, and male sex led to higher percentual difference in eGFR post-donation.
Conclusion:
In this study, with a high proportion of high BMI living kidney donors, female sex, age lower than 60 years, and non-genetic relationship with recipient were persistently associated with higher increase in post-donation kidney function. Ethnicity and BMI, per se, should not be a barrier to increasing the living donor kidney pool.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 883 |
| Journal | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 20 Jun 2019 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of donors’ demographic characteristics in renal function post-living kidney donation. Analysis of a UK single centre cohort'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver