Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The ENHANCE-3 study: venetoclax and azacitidine plus magrolimab or placebo for untreated AML unfit for intensive therapy

  • Naval Daver*
  • , Paresh Vyas
  • , Gerwin Huls
  • , Hartmut Döhner
  • , Sébastien Maury
  • , Jan Novak
  • , Cristina Papayannidis
  • , Carmen Martínez Chamorro
  • , Pau Montesinos
  • , Rabin Niroula
  • , Pierre Fenaux
  • , Jordi Esteve
  • , Shang Ju Wu
  • , Adrien De Voeght
  • , Jiri Mayer
  • , Peter J.M. Valk
  • , Lisa Johnson
  • , Mei Dong
  • , Ke Liu
  • , Sowmya Kuwahara
  • Kenneth Caldwell, Guru Subramanian Guru Murthy
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • University Medical Centre Groningen
  • University Hospital Ulm
  • Hôpital Henri Mondor
  • University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady
  • University Hospital S. Orsola
  • Universidad Europea de Madrid
  • Hospital Universitario La Fe
  • Rhode Island Hospital
  • Hospital St. Louis
  • Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
  • National Taiwan University
  • University of Liege
  • Masaryk University
  • Gilead Sciences, Inc.
  • Medical College of Wisconsin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

36 Citations (Scopus)
45 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for intensive chemotherapy (IC) have limited treatment options. The phase 3 ENHANCE-3 study aimed to determine whether magrolimab (magrolimab arm) was superior to placebo (control arm) when either was combined with venetoclax and azacitidine. Adults with previously untreated AML who were ineligible for IC were randomized to receive magrolimab (1 mg/kg on days 1 and 4, 15 mg/kg on day 8, 30 mg/kg on days 11 and 15, then weekly for 5 weeks, and then every 2 weeks) or placebo, venetoclax (100 mg on day 1, 200 mg on day 2, and 400 mg daily thereafter), and azacitidine (75 mg/m2 days 1-7) in 28-day cycles. The primary end point was overall survival (OS); key secondary end points included complete remission (CR) rate and safety. After randomization of 378 patients, the trial was stopped at a prespecified interim analysis owing to futility. At final analysis, with median follow-up of 7.6 months (magrolimab arm) vs 7.4 months (control arm), median OS was 10.7 vs 14.1 months (hazard ratio, 1.178; 95% confidence interval, 0.848-1.637). The CR rate within 6 cycles was 41.3% vs 46.0%. Addition of magrolimab to venetoclax and azacitidine resulted in more fatal adverse events (19.0% vs 11.4%), primarily driven by grade 5 infections (11.1% vs 6.5%) and respiratory events (2.6% vs 0%). There were similar incidences of any-grade infections, febrile neutropenia, and neutropenia between arms. These results highlight the difficulty in improving outcomes for patients with AML who were ineligible for IC. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT05079230.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)601-611
Number of pages11
JournalBlood
Volume146
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jul 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 American Society of Hematology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The ENHANCE-3 study: venetoclax and azacitidine plus magrolimab or placebo for untreated AML unfit for intensive therapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this