Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The evaluation of follow-up strategies of watch-and-wait patients with a complete response after neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer

  • Hester E. Haak
  • , Jan Žmuc
  • , the Dutch Watch-and-Wait Consortium
  • , Doenja M.J. Lambregts
  • , Regina G.H. Beets-Tan
  • , Jarno Melenhorst
  • , Geerard L. Beets
  • , Monique Maas*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Netherlands Cancer Institute
  • Maastricht University
  • Institute of Oncology Ljubljana
  • Leiden University Medical Centre
  • Utrecht University
  • Leiden University
  • Diakonessenhuis Utrecht
  • North West Hospital Group
  • Dijklander Ziekenhuis, lokatie Hoorn
  • VU University Medical Center
  • Isala Clinics
  • Radboud University Medical Center
  • ETZ Elisabeth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: 

Many of the current follow-up schedules in a watch-and-wait approach include very frequent MRI and endoscopy examinations to ensure early detection of local regrowth (LR). The aim of this study was to analyse the occurrence and detection of LR in a watch-and-wait cohort and to suggest a more efficient follow-up schedule. 

Method: 

Rectal cancer patients with a clinical complete response after neoadjuvant therapy were prospectively and retrospectively included in a multicentre watch-and-wait registry between 2004 and 2018, with the current follow-up schedule with 3-monthly endoscopy and MRI in the first year and 6 monthly thereafter. A theoretical comparison was constructed for the detection of LR in the current follow-up schedule against four other hypothetical schedules. 

Results: 

In all, 50/304 (16%) of patients developed a LR. The majority (98%) were detected at ≤2 years, located in the lumen (94%) and were visible on endoscopy (88%). The theoretical comparison of the different hypothetical schedules suggests that the optimal follow-up schedule should focus on the first 2 years with 3-monthly endoscopy and 3–6 monthly MRI. Longer intervals in the first 2 years will cause delays in diagnosis of LR ranging from 0 to 5 months. After 2 years, increasing the interval from 6 to 12 months did not cause important delays. 

Conclusion: 

The optimal follow-up schedule for a watch-and-wait policy in patients with a clinical complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer should include frequent endoscopy and to a lesser degree MRI in the first 2 years. Longer intervals, up to 12 months, can be considered after 2 years.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1785-1792
Number of pages8
JournalColorectal Disease
Volume23
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2021
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The evaluation of follow-up strategies of watch-and-wait patients with a complete response after neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this