Abstract
This paper aims to explicitly account for the impact of inertia (or habit) on departure time decisions, and explore (1) to what extent departure time is influenced by inertia, (2) what influences individuals’ inertia with respect to departure time decisions, and (3) to what extent it impacts transport policies. We estimate an integrated choice and latent variable (ICLV) model using a stated preference survey for morning car commuters in the Greater Copenhagen Area. We interact the rescheduling components in the Scheduling Model (SM) with the latent variable Inertia. The modelling results show that higher levels of inertia yields higher rescheduling penalties and lower willing to shift departure time. Furthermore, we find that inertia in departure time is influenced by gender, presence of children in the household as well as work type. We test the behavioral responses to demand management policies for segments with different inertia, and find that the least inertial segment showed the highest substitution patterns, while the most inertial segment show the lowest substitution patterns. Finally, we compared the ICLV model to a reference model without inertia, and find that the effects of the demand management strategy is overestimated if inertia is neglected.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 272-289 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice |
Volume | 133 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 7 Feb 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:The research was conducted during the first author’s research exchange at the Institute for Choice, University of South Australia and the first author would like to thank the academic and administrative staff for their hospitality and constructive feedback. The research was partly funded by The Independent Research Fund Denmark, Otto Mønsted Fonden, Cowi Fonden, Reinholdt W. Jorck og hustrus Fond, P. A. Fiskers Fond, Hedorfs Fond, IDAs og Berg-Nielsens Studie- og Støttefond.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd