Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The impact of positive surgical margins after cystectomy on oncological outcomes: a nationwide study from the Prospective Bladder Cancer Infrastructure (ProBCI)

  • Jikke Bosveld*
  • , Tri Q. Nguyen
  • , Joost L. Boormans
  • , ProBCI Study Group
  • , Antoine G. van der Heijden
  • , Niven Mehra
  • , Lambertus A. Kiemeney
  • , Katja K.H. Aben
  • , Richard P. Meijer
  • , Anke Richters
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Utrecht University
  • Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL)
  • Radboud University Medical Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This nationwide cohort study evaluated if surgical margin status alongside existing postoperative risk indicators improves identification of bladder cancer patients who may benefit from adjuvant therapy following radical cystectomy (RC). Adults with cT2–4aN0/xM0 disease (November 2017–December 2020) who underwent RC were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to assess the independent prognostic effect of positive surgical margins (carcinoma in situ [CIS] only or invasive carcinoma) on PFS and OS. Among 1,445 patients (53% open, 47% robot-assisted), 9.3% had positive margins. In the entire cohort, OS was 79% at 12 and 60% at 48 months after RC. Multivariable Cox regression showed worse OS (HR 2.02, 95%-CI 1.58–2.58) in patients with surgical margins with invasive carcinoma versus patients with negative margins. Patients with only CIS in the margins showed no difference for OS versus negative margins (HR 1.30, 95%-CI 0.80–2.12). Invasive positive margins should be considered a ‘high-risk feature’ due to impaired survival, warranting investigation of the potential efficacy of adjuvant therapy (i.e., radiotherapy or systemic therapy).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)42-51
Number of pages10
JournalTijdschrift voor Urologie
Volume16
Issue number2-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Feb 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2026.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of positive surgical margins after cystectomy on oncological outcomes: a nationwide study from the Prospective Bladder Cancer Infrastructure (ProBCI)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this