Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The impact of tumor location on the value of lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

  • Yutaka Endo
  • , Zorays Moazzam
  • , Henrique A. Lima
  • , Laura Alaimo
  • , Muhammad M. Munir
  • , Chanza F. Shaikh
  • , Alfredo Guglielmi
  • , Luca Aldrighetti
  • , Matthew Weiss
  • , Todd W. Bauer
  • , Sorin Alexandrescu
  • , George A. Poultsides
  • , Minoru Kitago
  • , Shishir K. Maithel
  • , Hugo P. Marques
  • , Guillaume Martel
  • , Carlo Pulitano
  • , Feng Shen
  • , François Cauchy
  • , Bas G. Koerkamp
  • Itaru Endo, Timothy M. Pawlik*
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Ohio State University
  • University of Verona
  • Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • University of Virginia School of Medicine
  • Fundeni Clinical Institute
  • Stanford University
  • Keio University
  • Emory University
  • Hospital Curry Cabral
  • University of Ottawa
  • The University of Sydney School of Medicine
  • Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital
  • Beaujon Hospital
  • University School of Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: The therapeutic role of lymphadenectomy (LND) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients remains ill-defined. We sought to analyze the therapeutic value of LND relative to tumor location and preoperative lymph node metastasis (LNM) risk. Methods: Patients who underwent curative-intent hepatic resection of ICC between 1990 and 2020 were included from a multi-institutional database. Therapeutic LND (tLND) was defined as LND that harvested ≥3 lymph nodes. Results: Among 662 patients, 178 (26.9%) individuals received tLND. Patients were categorized into central type ICC (n = 156, 23.6%) and peripheral type ICC (n = 506, 76.4%). Central type harbored multiple adverse clinicopathologic factors and worse overall survival (OS) compared with peripheral type (5-year OS, central: 27.0% vs. peripheral: 47.2%, p < 0.001). After consideration of preoperative LNM risk, patients with central type and high-risk LNM who underwent tLND survived longer than individuals who did not (5-year OS, tLND: 27.9% vs. non-tLND: 9.0%, p = 0.001), whereas tLND was not associated with better survival among patients with peripheral type ICC or low-risk LNM. The therapeutic index of hepatoduodenal ligament (HDL) and other regions was higher in central type than in peripheral type, which was more pronounced among high-risk LNM patients. Conclusions: Central type ICC with high-risk LNM should undergo LND involving regions beyond the HDL.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)650-658
Number of pages9
JournalHPB
Volume25
Issue number6
Early online date22 Feb 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of tumor location on the value of lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this