The incidence of extraction site incisional hernia after minimally invasive colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Floris P.J. den Hartog*, Sarah van Egmond, Marijn M. Poelman, Anand G. Menon, Gert Jan Kleinrensink, Johan F. Lange, Pieter J. Tanis, Eva B. Deerenberg

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)
39 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aim: Minimally invasive colorectal surgery reduces surgical trauma with better preservation of abdominal wall integrity, but the extraction site is still at risk of incisional hernia (IH). The aim of this study was to determine pooled incidence of IH for each type of extraction site and to compare rates of IH after midline, nonmidline and Pfannenstiel extraction. Method: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using the PRISMA guidelines. Single-armed and multiple-armed cohort studies and randomized controlled trials regarding minimally invasive colorectal surgery were searched from five databases. Outcomes were pooled and compared with random-effects, inverse-variance models. Risk of bias within the studies was assessed using the Cochrane ROBINS-I and RoB 2 tool. Results: Thirty six studies were included, with a total 11,788 patients. The pooled extraction site IH rate was 16.0% for midline (n = 4081), 9.3% for umbilical (n = 2425), 5.2% for transverse (n = 3213), 9.4% for paramedian (n = 134) and 2.1% for Pfannenstiel (n = 1449). Nonmidline extraction (transverse and paramedian) showed significantly lower odds ratios (ORs) for IH when compared with midline extraction (including umbilical). Pfannenstiel extraction resulted in a significantly lower OR for IH compared with midline [OR 0.12 (0.50–0.30)], transverse [OR 0.25 (0.13–0.50)] and umbilical (OR 0.072 [0.033–0.16]) extraction sites. The risks of surgical site infection, seroma/haematoma or wound dehiscence were not significantly different in any of the analyses. Conclusion: Pfannenstiel extraction is the preferred method in minimally invasive colorectal surgery. In cases where Pfannenstiel extraction is not possible, surgeons should avoid specimen extraction in the midline.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)586-599
Number of pages14
JournalColorectal Disease
Volume25
Issue number4
Early online date22 Dec 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors wish to thank W. M. Bramer and E. Krabbendam from the Erasmus MC Medical Library for developing and updating the search strategies.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Colorectal Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The incidence of extraction site incisional hernia after minimally invasive colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this