The Modal-Epistemic Argument Self-undermined

Stefan Wintein*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In a recent article, Emanuel Rutten defends his Modal-Epistemic Argument (MEA) for the existence of God against various objections that I raised against it. In this article, I observe that Rutten’s defence fails for various reasons. Most notably though, the defence is self-undermining: the very claims that Rutten argues for in his defence yield novel counterexamples to the first premise of the MEA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-15
Number of pages15
JournalSophia
Volume62
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Mar 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Modal-Epistemic Argument Self-undermined'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this