Abstract
In this article we present a conceptual overview of relevant interpretations of what state neutrality may imply; we suggest a distinction between inclusive neutrality and exclusive neutrality. This distinction provides a useful framework for understanding the several positions as presented by the parties in the Lautsi case. We conclude by suggesting a solution for the Lautsi case that might provide a more viable solution.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 267-272 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Religion & Human Rights: An International Journal |
Volume | 6 |
Issue number | 3 |
Publication status | Published - 24 Nov 2011 |