The Neutral State and the Mandatory Crucifix

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article we present a conceptual overview of relevant interpretations of what state neutrality may imply; we suggest a distinction between inclusive neutrality and exclusive neutrality. This distinction provides a useful framework for understanding the several positions as presented by the parties in the Lautsi case. We conclude by suggesting a solution for the Lautsi case that might provide a more viable solution.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)267-272
Number of pages6
JournalReligion & Human Rights: An International Journal
Volume6
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 24 Nov 2011

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Neutral State and the Mandatory Crucifix'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this