In this article we present a conceptual overview of relevant interpretations of what state neutrality may imply; we suggest a distinction between inclusive neutrality and exclusive neutrality. This distinction provides a useful framework for understanding the several positions as presented by the parties in the Lautsi case. We conclude by suggesting a solution for the Lautsi case that might provide a more viable solution.
|Number of pages||6|
|Journal||Religion & Human Rights: An International Journal|
|Publication status||Published - 24 Nov 2011|