The oesophageal balloon for respiratory monitoring in ventilated patients: updated clinical review and practical aspects

Annemijn H. Jonkman*, Irene Telias, Elena Spinelli, Evangelia Akoumianaki, Lise Piquilloud

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

30 Citations (Scopus)
91 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

There is a well-recognised importance for personalising mechanical ventilation settings to protect the lungs and the diaphragm for each individual patient. Measurement of oesophageal pressure (Poes) as an estimate of pleural pressure allows assessment of partitioned respiratory mechanics and quantification of lung stress, which helps our understanding of the patient’s respiratory physiology and could guide individualisation of ventilator settings. Oesophageal manometry also allows breathing effort quantification, which could contribute to improving settings during assisted ventilation and mechanical ventilation weaning. In parallel with technological improvements, Poes monitoring is now available for daily clinical practice. This review provides a fundamental understanding of the relevant physiological concepts that can be assessed using Poes measurements, both during spontaneous breathing and mechanical ventilation. We also present a practical approach for implementing oesophageal manometry at the bedside. While more clinical data are awaited to confirm the benefits of Poes-guided mechanical ventilation and to determine optimal targets under different conditions, we discuss potential practical approaches, including positive end-expiratory pressure setting in controlled ventilation and assessment of inspiratory effort during assisted modes.

Original languageEnglish
Article number220186
JournalEuropean Respiratory Review
Volume32
Issue number168
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jun 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright: © The authors 2023.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The oesophageal balloon for respiratory monitoring in ventilated patients: updated clinical review and practical aspects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this