Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The potential benefits and disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery for ulcerative colitis: A review of current evidence

  • Christianne J. Buskens*
  • , Saloomeh Sahami
  • , Pieter J. Tanis
  • , Willem A. Bemelman
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Amsterdam UMC

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlePopular

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Up to 35% of patients with ulcerative colitis will require surgery during the course of their disease. Nowadays, a total colectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the preferred procedure, which can be performed open or via laparoscopic approach. Since the early '90s, minimally invasive techniques have gained popularity, but the extend of restorative procedures in these patients has restricted the use of laparoscopic approaches mainly to elective procedures in specialised centres. This review discusses the benefits and disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery when compared to open surgery. It presents the current evidence on short-term and long-term post-operative results, functional outcome, fecundity, and costs, for both elective and emergency indications. In addition, the value of new techniques (including single port surgery) and alternative laparoscopic approaches (e.g. ileo-rectal anastomosis, Kock-pouch and appendectomy) will be discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19-27
Number of pages9
JournalBest Practice and Research: Clinical Gastroenterology
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The potential benefits and disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery for ulcerative colitis: A review of current evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this