Abstract
This chapter will focus on the aims, methods, and problems of both Husserl’s and Foucault’s projects in order to mark their differences and their similarities. In so doing, it will underscore their shared (Kantian) goal: to strengthen the human capacity for reason as a critical means of theoretical and practical reflection. It is my contention that the differences between the thinkers’ specific aims only reinforce their respective routes toward a common objective. In this respect, I will argue that both thinkers engage in a project to objectify subjective reason. It is my contention that both thinkers apply a methodological reduction in order to understand and clarify the discursive and social powers that determine the praxis of reasoning. As a result, Husserl sought to make the sciences aware of their foundations in the lifeworld, while Foucault sought to expose their basis in and through the workings of power.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Phenomenology as Critique |
| Subtitle of host publication | Why Method Matters |
| Editors | Andreea Smaranda Aldea, David Carr, Sara Heinämaa |
| Place of Publication | New York |
| Publisher | Routledge |
| Chapter | 16 |
| Pages | 252-270 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781003191483 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781032015118 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 30 Mar 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright: © 2022 selection and editorial matter, Andreea Smaranda Aldea, David Carr, and Sara Heinämaa. All rights reserved.Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Power of the Reduction and the Reduction of Power: Husserl's and Foucault's Critical Project'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver