Abstract
It is well established in the working memory literature, that performance can be improved by cueing attention toward the position of a to-be-tested item, even after that item's presentation. This retro-cue benefit is often characterized as the joint outcome of two different effects: facilitation of recall and memory strengthening at the cued position. While the latter has been mainly explained by increased context-content binding, competing hypotheses exist to explain the facilitation of recall. The present study focuses on two of these hypotheses: the removal of non-cued information and the protection of cued information against interference. I replicate the retro-cue effect for verbal material and provide strong evidence for its protective effect. However, I did not find support for the removal hypothesis. This lack of support follows from two empirical findings: Retro-cueing does not decrease, rather increases the conditional probability of intrusions, and the retro-cue benefit does not interact with memory load.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 128-138 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Experimental Psychology |
| Volume | 65 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - May 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |