Abstract
When a firm issues a management forecast, analysts who have observed more forecasts from this firm since covering it (i.e., have more MF-Experience) subsequently improve their own accuracy more and provide timelier earnings forecasts for other (non-issuing) firms in the same industry. We also find that, subsequent to a management forecast, investors are more responsive to forecast revisions for non-issuing firms made by analysts with more MF-Experience. Further tests suggest that our results are not explained by endogeneity in firm coverage.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1265-1287 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | The Accounting Review |
Volume | 88 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2013 |