Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The role of environmental impact in healthcare providers’ choices of inhalers for treatment of asthma and COPD: a discrete choice experiment

  • I. G. Arslan*
  • , M. Vervloet
  • , E. W. de Bekker-Grob
  • , K. Hek
  • , B. J. Knottnerus
  • , C. Wagner
  • , L. van Eikenhorst*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research
  • Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre
  • Erasmus Center for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

17 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Pressurised metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs), often prescribed for the treatment of COPD and asthma have a high global warming potential (GWP) compared to dry powder inhalers (DPIs) and soft-mist inhalers. Despite calls to switch from high to DPIs or soft-mist inhalers, prescriptions of pMDIs have increased in recent years. Understanding healthcare providers' preferences can help develop strategies to promote prescribing low GWP inhalers. This study aimed to determine healthcare providers' preferences when prescribing inhalers for asthma and COPD, including its GWP (i.e. environmental impact). Methods: A survey containing a discrete choice experiment was conducted. Primary care providers were repetitively asked to choose between scenarios of inhalers that differed in five attributes: multidose or unidose system (i.e. ease of use), reduction in number of exacerbations, side effects, out of pocket costs and GWP. A multinomial logit model was used to determine the relative importance of the attributes. Results: A total of 76 healthcare providers (general practitioners (GPs), nurse specialists and nurse practitioners) completed the survey. On average, the attribute ‘reduction in number of exacerbations’ was most important in their choice for inhalers, followed by, ‘side effects’, ‘GWP’, ‘out of pocket costs’, and ‘multidose or unidose system’. Healthcare providers were willing to accept a high GWP inhaler instead of a low GWP inhaler when the inhaler reduced the number of exacerbations and were willing to opt for low GWP inhaler with higher out of pocket costs instead of a high GWP inhaler with lower out of pocket costs. Conclusions: Healthcare providers valued clinical factors (i.e. reduction in number of exacerbations and low side effects) as most important when choosing inhalers for their patients with COPD or asthma, however GWP was also an important driver of choice. Understanding these preferences can support strategies to support sustainable inhalers for COPD and asthma, contributing to climate change mitigation. For example by enhancing the provision of information regarding inhaler GWP, while ensuring that clinical effectiveness remains the primary focus.

Original languageEnglish
Article number278
JournalBMC Family Practice
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Sept 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2025.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The role of environmental impact in healthcare providers’ choices of inhalers for treatment of asthma and COPD: a discrete choice experiment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this