The Anxiety of Authenticity: The Historical Reception of Broken Blossoms (1919), Shanghai Express (1932) and The Good Earth (1937) in China

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
125 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article analyses the authenticity principles connected to Hollywood’s portrayal of China and the Chinese through three important American films screened or banned in China – Broken Blossoms (1919), Shanghai Express (1932), and The Good Earth (1937) – but with a special focus on both the historical reception and censorship of these films within China itself. It is argued that the feeling of (in)authenticity played an important role in Chinese audiences’ appreciation of Hollywood narratives about the Chinese. Rather than focusing on the realistic or unrealistic depiction of the films, it is more effective to consider authenticity as a felt experience of emotional engagement and deeply felt sensuality. The felt authenticity signifies different constructed experiences and views which are rooted in different cultures and societies. The frequent appearance of ‘Chinese’ in American films produced in the first half of twentieth century had a ripple effect that impacted the Chinese public’s own self-perception and self-recognition. The yearning for authenticity – expressed in the form of the government's censorship standards and procedures, as well as widespread protest in Chinese communities domestically and abroad – connected profoundly to the emerging sense of national identity.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)232-250
JournalHistorical Journal of Film, Radio and Television
Volume41
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

2021 IAMHIST & Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group

Research programs

  • ESHCC HIS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Anxiety of Authenticity: The Historical Reception of Broken Blossoms (1919), Shanghai Express (1932) and The Good Earth (1937) in China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this