Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Thinking “Outside the Box” Whilst Remaining “Inside the Box”: Do Rules and Procedures Demotivate Creativity and Innovation in the Public Sector?

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Public servants’ creativity is the origin of innovations, improvements and solutions to policies/services and crucial to serving public interests. Public servants, however, differ strongly in pioneering creativity—proactive generation of radical and original ideas. Using SEM on Flitspanel cross-sectional survey data from 930 Dutch public servants, this preregistered study tested hypotheses that this results from public servants being required to creatively “think outside-the-box” whilst remaining “inside-the-box” of formalized rules/procedures; a struggle that may demotivate and hamper pioneering creativity. Evidence is found for negative relations between formalization and two dimensions of pioneering creativity and positive relations between intrinsic motivation and all three dimensions of pioneering creativity, though no evidence is found for a mediation indicating that formalization hampers creativity through demotivation. Findings provide a detailed and nuanced understanding of how public servants’ creativity appears affected by formalization and motivation, how these concepts interrelate in the public sector, indicating corresponding HR strategies/tactics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)190-215
Number of pages26
JournalReview of Public Personnel Administration
Volume46
Issue number1
Early online date2 Aug 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2026

Bibliographical note

© The Author(s) 2024. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Thinking “Outside the Box” Whilst Remaining “Inside the Box”: Do Rules and Procedures Demotivate Creativity and Innovation in the Public Sector?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this