Thrombectomy in high-risk pulmonary embolism – device versus thrombolysis: rationale and design of the TORPEDO-NL investigator-initiated, academically-sponsored, multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial

  • W. J.E. Stenger*
  • , C. A. den Uil
  • , W. J.R. Rietdijk
  • , I. Al Amri
  • , J. M. Montero-Cabezas
  • , C. V. Elzo Kraemer
  • , T. E. van Mens
  • , C. L. Meuwese
  • , N. M.D.A. van Mieghem
  • , M. N. Lauw
  • , L. M. van den Toorn
  • , S. Levolger
  • , K. M. van de Luijtgaarden
  • , R. A. Sprenger
  • , J. M. van Dongen
  • , F. Imani
  • , M. Meuwissen
  • , K. M. Kant
  • , R. A.H.M. Aarts
  • , K. Winckers
  • R. J.B. Brans, G. J.A.J.M. Kuiper, R. Schnabel, Y. M. Ende-Verhaar, T. A.J. Urlings, T. A. Ruys, S. Slot, H. J. Scheffer, S. O.J.H. Adriaansens, M. F. Boomsma, I. M. Nijholt, S. Walen, J. Leentjens, S. Jenniskens, R. J. van Geuns, A. Griffioen, M. Nijkeuter, D. Ruigrok, J. A. Vos, D. A. Kies, P. R. Tuinman, R. J. Lely, B. B. van der Meijs, M. M.C. Hovens, S. V. Konstantinides, M. S. Mol, A. O. Kraaijeveld, F. A. Klok
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
20 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: 

Catheter-directed thrombectomy (CDT) is a promising alternative to full dose thrombolysis in patients with acute high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE), expected to have a more direct effect on pulmonary artery clot burden and a better safety profile. Randomized trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of CDT in high-risk patients are currently unavailable. 

Methods and results: 

The TORPEDO-NL study is an investigator-initiated, publicly-funded, multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the superiority of CDT over systemic thrombolysis in patients with high-risk PE. Adults with: 1) confirmed acute PE, 2) a high risk for mortality, and 3) CDT available and technically feasible, will be randomized 2:1 to CDT versus systemic thrombolysis. The primary outcome is the composite incidence of all-cause mortality, treatment failure, major bleeding, and all-cause stroke at day 30. Secondary outcomes include desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) at day 7, length of hospital stay, patient-reported outcomes including quality of life and symptom burden, functional recovery, and 1-year cost-effectiveness. The trial anticipates recruiting 111 patients and is funded by the The Netherlands Health Care Institute, The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, the Dutch Heart Foundation, and unrestricted grants from Penumbra Inc. and Inari Medical.ClinicalTrials.govnumber,NCT06833827.

Conclusions: 

TORPEDO-NL is the first publicly-funded randomized trial to investigate the effect of CDT treatment specifically in high-risk PE patients. The trial is anticipated to play an important role in revising recommendations for high-risk PE treatment in international guidelines.

Original languageEnglish
Article number109420
JournalThrombosis Research
Volume255
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Thrombectomy in high-risk pulmonary embolism – device versus thrombolysis: rationale and design of the TORPEDO-NL investigator-initiated, academically-sponsored, multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this