Abstract
Recently, several measures in international economic law emerged with the aim of promoting women’s economic empowerment (examples here, here and here). Though broadly welcomed by both policy-makers and scholars, their largely hortatory effects lead some to query whether this “gender turn” fully recognises – and can meaningfully address – the pre-existing structural obstacles to women’s full participation in economic life. In this article, I explore whether the “gender turn” might be leveraged for deeper critical engagement with the project of international economic law (IEL). Such engagement could expose the “interest convergence” which this gender trade measure ignores (example here); articulate anew the economic violence to women and other marginalised communities that IEL continually, structurally underpins; and ultimately invigorate a debate on the possibilities of a dedicated intersectional analysis of IEL.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Media of output | Blog |
| Publication status | Published - 6 Mar 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Towards FIEL-ine Legalities: Symposium - Women in International Law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver