TY - JOUR
T1 - Trade Openness and Environmental Emissions
T2 - Evidence from a Meta-Analysis
AU - Afesorgbor, Sylvanus Kwaku
AU - Demena, Binyam Afewerk
N1 - JEL Classification: F6, F14, F18, C81
Additional information:
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.:
We thank Peter van Bergeijk, Liam Kelly and all participants in the Agricultural & Applied Economics Association (AAEA) Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia (2019) for their useful comments. We are grateful to John Cranfield and the department of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Guelph for the financial assistance and Mikayla Del Medico for her research assistantship. The usual disclaimer applies.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - How trade affects environmental emissions has generated heterogeneous results over the years. This is due to empirical ambiguities that are endemic in the literature. In order to evaluate and explain the discrepancy in the literature, this paper conducts a meta-analysis of 88 empirical studies published until 2018. Our results show that trade contributes to environmental emissions after controlling for publication bias and heterogeneity. In explaining the heterogeneous results across the primary studies, our findings largely suggest the estimated elasticities depend systematically on the estimation characteristics, the choice of pollutants and the publication characteristics of the primary studies. Accounting for heterogeneity, the result remains robust only for CO2 emissions compared to SO2. Overall, the trade elasticity of emissions effect remains robust when we decompose the analyses for different groups of countries, however, the emissions-content of trade is more pronounced for developed compared to developing countries.
AB - How trade affects environmental emissions has generated heterogeneous results over the years. This is due to empirical ambiguities that are endemic in the literature. In order to evaluate and explain the discrepancy in the literature, this paper conducts a meta-analysis of 88 empirical studies published until 2018. Our results show that trade contributes to environmental emissions after controlling for publication bias and heterogeneity. In explaining the heterogeneous results across the primary studies, our findings largely suggest the estimated elasticities depend systematically on the estimation characteristics, the choice of pollutants and the publication characteristics of the primary studies. Accounting for heterogeneity, the result remains robust only for CO2 emissions compared to SO2. Overall, the trade elasticity of emissions effect remains robust when we decompose the analyses for different groups of countries, however, the emissions-content of trade is more pronounced for developed compared to developing countries.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85119824100&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10640-021-00627-0
DO - 10.1007/s10640-021-00627-0
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85119824100
VL - 81
SP - 287
EP - 321
JO - Environmental and Resource Economics
JF - Environmental and Resource Economics
SN - 0924-6460
IS - 2
ER -
