Traditional Methods versus Quantitative Sensory Testing of the Feet at Risk: Results from the Rotterdam Diabetic Foot Study

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	Undefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)	752E-763E
Journal	Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume	139
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000003047
Publication status	Published - 2017

Research programs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

@article{e3e3b49ad1d84d19b04967197bc4842f,

title = "Traditional Methods versus Quantitative Sensory Testing of the Feet at Risk: Results from the Rotterdam Diabetic Foot Study",

author = "Willem Rinkel and MC Cabezas and JH Setyo and \{van Neck\}, Han and JH Coert",

year = "2017",

doi = "10.1097/prs.0000000000003047",

language = "Undefined/Unknown",

volume = "139",

pages = "752E--763E",

journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",

issn = "0032-1052",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams \& Wilkins",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Traditional Methods versus Quantitative Sensory Testing of the Feet at Risk: Results from the Rotterdam Diabetic Foot Study

AU - Rinkel, Willem

AU - Cabezas, MC

AU - Setyo, JH

AU - van Neck, Han

AU - Coert, JH

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

U2 - 10.1097/prs.0000000000003047

DO - 10.1097/prs.0000000000003047

M3 - Article

SN - 0032-1052

VL - 139

SP - 752E-763E

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

IS - 3

ER -