Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation to treat aortic para-valvular regurgitation after TAVI

  • Uri Landes*
  • , Olga Morelli
  • , Haim Danenberg
  • , Janarthanan Sathananthan
  • , Ole De Backer
  • , Lars Sondergaard
  • , Mohamed Abdel-Wahab
  • , Sung Han Yoon
  • , Raj R. Makkar
  • , Holger Thiele
  • , Won Keun Kim
  • , Christian Hamm
  • , Mayra Guerrero
  • , Josep Rodés-Cabau
  • , Taishi Okuno
  • , Thomas Pilgrim
  • , Antonio Mangieri
  • , Nicolas M. Van Mieghem
  • , Didier Tchétché
  • , Wolfgang H. Schoels
  • Marco Barbanti, Jan Malte Sinning, Alfonso Ielasi, Giuseppe Tarantini, Federico De Marco, Ariel Finkelstein, Horst Sievert, Martin Andreas, Azeem Latib, Rebecca Godfrey, David Hildick-Smith, Lisa Manevich, Ran Kornowski, Tamim M. Nazif, Martin B. Leon, John G. Webb
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Para-valvular regurgitation (PVR) after transcatheter aortic valve (TAV) implantation is associated with increased mortality. Redo-TAVI may be applied to treat PVR, yet with unknown efficacy. We thought to assess redo-TAVI efficacy in reducing PVR using the Redo-TAVI registry (45 centers; 600 TAV-in-TAV cases). Methods: Patients were excluded if redo-TAVI was done urgently (N = 253), for isolated TAV stenosis (N = 107) or if regurgitation location at presentation remained undetermined (N = 123). The study group of patients with PVR (N = 70) were compared against patients with intra-valvular regurgitation (IVR) (N = 41). Echocardiographic examinations of 67 (60%) patients were reassessed in a core-lab for data accuracy validation. Results: Core-lab examination validated the jet location in 66 (98.5%) patients. At 30 days, the rate of residual AR ≥ moderate was 7 (10%) in the PVR cohort vs. 1 (2.4%) in the IVR cohort, p = 0.137. The rate of procedural success was 53 (75.7%) vs. 33 (80.5%), p = 0.561; procedural safety 51 (72.8%) vs. 31 (75.6%), p = 0.727; and mortality 2 (2.9%) vs. 1 (2.4%), p = 0.896 at 30 days and 7 (18.6%) vs. 2 (11.5%), p = 0.671 at 1 year, respectively. Of patients with residual PVR ≥ moderate at 30 days, 5/7 occurred after implanting balloon-expandable in self-expanding TAV and 2/7 after balloon-expandable in balloon-expandable TAV. Conclusions: This study puts in perspective redo-TAVI efficacy and limitations to treat PVR after TAVI. Patient selection for this and other therapies for PVR needs further investigation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)31-34
Number of pages4
JournalInternational Journal of Cardiology
Volume364
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Elsevier B.V.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation to treat aortic para-valvular regurgitation after TAVI'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this