Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Transperineal minimally invasive APE: preliminary outcomes in a multicenter cohort

  • S. E. van Oostendorp*
  • , S. X. Roodbeen
  • , C.C. Chen
  • , A. Caycedo-Marulanda
  • , H. M. Joshi
  • , P. J. Tanis
  • , C. Cunningham
  • , J. B. Tuynman
  • , R. Hompes
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • University of Amsterdam
  • Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
  • Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center
  • Health Sciences North
  • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Amsterdam UMC

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Abdominoperineal excision (APE) for rectal cancer is associated with a relatively high risk of positive margins and postoperative morbidity, particularly related to perineal wound healing problems. It is unknown whether the use of a minimally invasive approach for the perineal part of these procedures can improve postoperative outcomes without oncological compromise. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of minimally invasive transperineal abdominoperineal excision (TpAPE) Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included all patients having TpAPE for primary low rectal cancer. The primary endpoint was the intraoperative complication rate. Secondary endpoints included major morbidity (Clavien–Dindo ≥ 3), histopathology results, and perineal wound healing. Results: A total of 32 TpAPE procedures were performed in five centers. A bilateral extralevator APE (ELAPE) was performed in 17 patients (53%), a unilateral ELAPE in 7 (22%), and an APE in 8 (25%). Intraoperative complications occurred in five cases (16%) and severe postoperative morbidity in three cases (9%). There were no perioperative deaths. A positive margin (R1) was observed in four patients (13%) and specimen perforation occurred in two (6%). The unilateral extralevator TpAPE group had worse specimen quality and a higher proportion of R1 resections than the bilateral ELAPE or standard APE groups. The rate of uncomplicated perineal wound healing was 53% (n = 17) and three patients (9%) required surgical reintervention. Conclusions: TpAPE seems to be feasible with acceptable perioperative morbidity and a relatively low rate of perineal wound dehiscence, while histopathological outcomes remain suboptimal. Additional evaluation of the viability of this technique is needed in the form of a prospective trial with standardization of the procedure, indication, audit of outcomes and performed by surgeons with vast experience in transanal total mesorectal excision.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)823-831
Number of pages9
JournalTechniques in Coloproctology
Volume24
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2020
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright: © 2020, The Author(s).

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Transperineal minimally invasive APE: preliminary outcomes in a multicenter cohort'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this