Two for the price of one: If moving beyond traditional single-best discrete choice experiments, should we use best-worst, best-best or ranking for preference elicitation?

Samare P.I. Huls*, Emily Lancsar, Bas Donkers, Jemimah Ride

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
33 Downloads (Pure)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Two for the price of one: If moving beyond traditional single-best discrete choice experiments, should we use best-worst, best-best or ranking for preference elicitation?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Nursing and Health Professions