Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Types of diagnostic errors reported by paediatric emergency providers in a global paediatric emergency care research network

  • Prashant Mahajan*
  • , Joseph A. Grubenhoff
  • , Jim Cranford
  • , Maala Bhatt
  • , James M. Chamberlain
  • , Todd Chang
  • , Mark Lyttle
  • , Rianne Oostenbrink
  • , Damian Roland
  • , Richard M. Rudy
  • , Kathy N. Shaw
  • , Robert Velasco Zuniga
  • , Apoorva Belle
  • , Nathan Kuppermann
  • , Hardeep Singh
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • University of Colorado School of Medicine
  • University of Ottawa
  • Children's National Medical Center
  • University of Southern California
  • University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of Leicester
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Hospital Universitario Río Hortega
  • University of California at Davis
  • Baylor College of Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
29 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background Diagnostic errors, reframed as missed opportunities for improving diagnosis (MOIDs), are poorly understood in the paediatric emergency department (ED) setting. We investigated the clinical experience, harm and contributing factors related to MOIDs reported by physicians working in paediatric EDs. Methods We developed a web-based survey in which physicians participating in the international Paediatric Emergency Research Network representing five out of six WHO regions, described examples of MOIDs involving their own or a colleague's patients. Respondents provided case summaries and answered questions regarding harm and factors contributing to the event. Results Of 1594 physicians surveyed, 412 (25.8%) responded (mean age=43 years (SD=9.2), 42.0% female, mean years in practice=12 (SD=9.0)). Patient presentations involving MOIDs had common undifferentiated symptoms at initial presentation, including abdominal pain (21.1%), fever (17.2%) and vomiting (16.5%). Patients were discharged from the ED with commonly reported diagnoses, including acute gastroenteritis (16.7%), viral syndrome (10.2%) and constipation (7.0%). Most reported MOIDs (65%) were detected on ED return visits (46% within 24 hours and 76% within 72 hours). The most common reported MOID was appendicitis (11.4%), followed by brain tumour (4.4%), meningitis (4.4%) and non-accidental trauma (4.1%). More than half (59.1%) of the reported MOIDs involved the patient/parent-provider encounter (eg, misinterpreted/ignored history or an incomplete/inadequate physical examination). Types of MOIDs and contributing factors did not differ significantly between countries. More than half of patients had either moderate (48.7%) or major (10%) harm due to the MOID. Conclusions An international cohort of paediatric ED physicians reported several MOIDs, often in children who presented to the ED with common undifferentiated symptoms. Many of these were related to patient/parent-provider interaction factors such as suboptimal history and physical examination. Physicians' personal experiences offer an underexplored source for investigating and mitigating diagnostic errors in the paediatric ED.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere002062
JournalBMJ Open Quality
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Mar 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding:
The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any
funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Types of diagnostic errors reported by paediatric emergency providers in a global paediatric emergency care research network'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this