Abstract
Background and Aims: Interferon-alpha (IFN-α) treatment for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) virus infection is finite and leads to relatively higher functional cure rates (HBsAg loss) than nucleo(s)tide analogue (NA) therapy. Effects of pegylated (PEG)/conventional IFN-α treatment on clinical outcomes were evaluated in an ultra-long-term follow-up of CHB patients. Methods: HBeAg-positive patients treated with (PEG)IFN-α at a tertiary referral centre between 1977-2014 were included. We reviewed medical charts and consulted the municipal registry for patient information. Patients were invited for a single visit at the outpatient clinic in the case of missing follow-up data. The endpoints included serum HBeAg/HBsAg loss and incidence of clinical events, using life table methods and person-years to analyze the incidence of events. Patients were censored upon retreatment. Results: The study cohort included 267 patients, 67% male, 58% Caucasian, with a median age of 32 years. The median follow-up duration was 11.5 years. The 5 and 10-year cumulative incidence of HBsAg loss were 14% and 32%, respectively. Baseline factors associated with a higher rate of HBsAg loss were male sex, Caucasian race, genotype A, age ≥40 years, and cirrhosis. HBsAg loss rates did not differ significantly between those who received short-term (≤24 weeks) vs long-term (>24 weeks) therapy. Both HBeAg and HBsAg loss were significantly associated with improved clinical outcomes. Early response (HBeAg loss) was associated with more HBsAg loss and better patient outcomes. Conclusions: During long-term follow-up, high rates of HBsAg loss were observed from a single (PEG)IFN-α course. Its persistent effects suggest that a role for IFN-α remains, potentially in novel combination therapies in search of a functional cure.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1933-1940.e1 |
Journal | Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology |
Volume | 19 |
Issue number | 9 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:Conflicts of interest These authors disclose the following: Milan J. Sonneveld has received speakers? fees and research support from Fujirebio, Roche, Gilead, and BMS; Robert J. de Knegt has received grants from Gilead Sciences and Janssen and has served as a consultant for Gilead Sciences and AbbVie. Bettina Hansen has received grants from Intercept and CymaBay and has served as a consultant for Intercept, CymaBay, Albireo, Mirum, and ChemomAb. Harry Janssen has received grants from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, MedImmune, Merck, and Roche; and has served as a consultant for AbbVie, Benitec, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, MedImmune, Merck, Roche, Arbutus, and Vir Biotechnology Inc. The remaining authors disclose no conflicts.
Funding Information:
Conflicts of interest These authors disclose the following: Milan J. Sonneveld has received speakers’ fees and research support from Fujirebio, Roche, Gilead, and BMS; Robert J. de Knegt has received grants from Gilead Sciences and Janssen and has served as a consultant for Gilead Sciences and AbbVie. Bettina Hansen has received grants from Intercept and CymaBay and has served as a consultant for Intercept, CymaBay, Albireo, Mirum, and ChemomAb. Harry Janssen has received grants from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, MedImmune, Merck, and Roche; and has served as a consultant for AbbVie, Benitec, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, MedImmune, Merck, Roche, Arbutus, and Vir Biotechnology Inc. The remaining authors disclose no conflicts.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 AGA Institute