Uncovering cognitive processes: Cued retrospective reporting based on eye-movement records

Tamara Van Gog, Saskia Brand-Gruwel, Ludo Van Meeuwen, Fred Paas

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlePopular

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The verbal reporting techniques used most in research on learning and instruction, concurrent and retrospective reporting, both have drawbacks. Retrospective reporting often results in omissions/fabrications, and concurrent reporting is difficult to implement when tasks impose high cognitive load or contain auditory information. Cued retrospective reporting (CRR) based on eye-movement records might be able to overcome these drawbacks: while maintaining the retrospective nature, the cue shows both physical (mouse/keyboard) and cognitive (eye movements) actions, thereby presumably leading to less omissions/fabrications. Because a previous study showed promising results, the present study extends the test of CRR to qualitative data (i.e., process coverage).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)416-417
Number of pages2
JournalComputer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL
Issue numberPART 3
Publication statusPublished - 2008
EventInternational Perspectives in the Learning Sciences: Cre8ing a Learning World - 8th International Conference for the Learning Sciences, ICLS 2008 - Utrecht, Netherlands
Duration: 23 Jun 200828 Jun 2008

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Uncovering cognitive processes: Cued retrospective reporting based on eye-movement records'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this