Abstract
The verbal reporting techniques used most in research on learning and instruction, concurrent and retrospective reporting, both have drawbacks. Retrospective reporting often results in omissions/fabrications, and concurrent reporting is difficult to implement when tasks impose high cognitive load or contain auditory information. Cued retrospective reporting (CRR) based on eye-movement records might be able to overcome these drawbacks: while maintaining the retrospective nature, the cue shows both physical (mouse/keyboard) and cognitive (eye movements) actions, thereby presumably leading to less omissions/fabrications. Because a previous study showed promising results, the present study extends the test of CRR to qualitative data (i.e., process coverage).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 416-417 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL |
| Issue number | PART 3 |
| Publication status | Published - 2008 |
| Event | International Perspectives in the Learning Sciences: Cre8ing a Learning World - 8th International Conference for the Learning Sciences, ICLS 2008 - Utrecht, Netherlands Duration: 23 Jun 2008 → 28 Jun 2008 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Uncovering cognitive processes: Cued retrospective reporting based on eye-movement records'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver