TY - JOUR
T1 - Understanding barriers and optimizing socio-cognitive assessment in the diagnosis of neurocognitive disorders
AU - Cerami, Chiara
AU - Boccardi, Marina
AU - the SIGNATURE initiative
AU - Meli, Claudia
AU - Panzavolta, Andrea
AU - Funghi, Giulia
AU - Festari, Cristina
AU - Cappa, Stefano F.
AU - Chatzikostopoulos, Thanos
AU - Chicherio, Christian
AU - Clarens, Florencia
AU - de Oliveira, Fabricio Ferreira
AU - Di Lorenzo, Francesco
AU - Filardi, Marco
AU - Ibanez, Agustin
AU - Girtler, Nicola
AU - Lebouvier, Thibaud
AU - Logroscino, Giancarlo
AU - Luca, Antonella
AU - MacPherson, Sarah E.
AU - Matias-Guiu, Jordi A.
AU - Piccoli, Tommaso
AU - Piguet, Olivier
AU - Pomati, Simone
AU - Russo, Mirella
AU - Sacco, Leonardo
AU - Schild, Ann Katrin
AU - Sensi, Stefano L.
AU - Shirk, Steven D.
AU - Sollberger, Marc
AU - Tábuas-Pereira, Miguel
AU - Tsolaki, Magda
AU - van den Berg, Esther
AU - Bertoux, Maxime
AU - Kumfor, Fiona
AU - Van den Stock, Jan
AU - Welsh-Bohmer, Kathleen A.
AU - Dodich, Alessandra
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Neuropsychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The British Psychological Society.
PY - 2025/9
Y1 - 2025/9
N2 - Harmonized neuropsychological assessment for neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) is an urgent priority in clinics. Neuropsychology assessments in NCDs seldom include tests exploring social cognitive skills. In 2022, we launched the SIGNATURE initiative to optimize socio-cognitive assessment in NCDs. Here, we report findings from the first initiative phase, including consortium creation and evaluation of the state of the art in socio-cognitive assessment in memory clinics. We developed an ad hoc online survey to explore practices and measures, relevance, and obstacles preventing the use of socio-cognitive testing in clinics. The survey was distributed within the SIGNATURE network. National coordinators were identified to disseminate the survey to local collaborators and scientific societies active in the field of dementia and/or neuropsychology. Data were analysed in aggregate form and stratified by geographical area and variables of interest. Four hundred and thirteen (413) responses from 10 European and Latin American geographical regions were recorded. Responders were balanced between physicians and psychologists. Seventy-eight (78) % of respondents reported no/limited experience with socio-cognitive measures; more than 85% agreed on their relevance in clinics. Ekman-60 faces was the most well-known and/or used task, followed by the Faux-Pas and Reading-the-Mind-in-the-Eyes tests. Lack of clinical measures, assessment time, guidelines, and education/training were reported as main obstacles. Real-life barriers prevent the adoption of socio-cognitive testing in clinics. Bidirectional collaboration between clinicians and researchers is required to address clinical needs and constraints and facilitate consistent socio-cognitive assessment.
AB - Harmonized neuropsychological assessment for neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) is an urgent priority in clinics. Neuropsychology assessments in NCDs seldom include tests exploring social cognitive skills. In 2022, we launched the SIGNATURE initiative to optimize socio-cognitive assessment in NCDs. Here, we report findings from the first initiative phase, including consortium creation and evaluation of the state of the art in socio-cognitive assessment in memory clinics. We developed an ad hoc online survey to explore practices and measures, relevance, and obstacles preventing the use of socio-cognitive testing in clinics. The survey was distributed within the SIGNATURE network. National coordinators were identified to disseminate the survey to local collaborators and scientific societies active in the field of dementia and/or neuropsychology. Data were analysed in aggregate form and stratified by geographical area and variables of interest. Four hundred and thirteen (413) responses from 10 European and Latin American geographical regions were recorded. Responders were balanced between physicians and psychologists. Seventy-eight (78) % of respondents reported no/limited experience with socio-cognitive measures; more than 85% agreed on their relevance in clinics. Ekman-60 faces was the most well-known and/or used task, followed by the Faux-Pas and Reading-the-Mind-in-the-Eyes tests. Lack of clinical measures, assessment time, guidelines, and education/training were reported as main obstacles. Real-life barriers prevent the adoption of socio-cognitive testing in clinics. Bidirectional collaboration between clinicians and researchers is required to address clinical needs and constraints and facilitate consistent socio-cognitive assessment.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105005398357
U2 - 10.1111/jnp.12431
DO - 10.1111/jnp.12431
M3 - Article
C2 - 40365933
AN - SCOPUS:105005398357
SN - 1748-6645
VL - 19
SP - 603
EP - 618
JO - Journal of Neuropsychology
JF - Journal of Neuropsychology
IS - 3
ER -