Unpacking all-inclusive superordinate categories: Comparing correlates and consequences of global citizenship and human identities

Margarida Carmona*, Rita Guerra, John F. Dovidio, Joep Hofhuis, Denis Sindic

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
20 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Previous research suggests that all-inclusive superordinate categories, such as “citizens of the world” and “humans,” may represent different socio-psychological realities. Yet it remains unclear whether the use of different categories may account for different psychological processes and attitudinal or behavioral outcomes. Two studies extended previous research by comparing how these categories are cognitively represented, and their impact on intergroup helping from host communities toward migrants. In a correlational study, 168 nationals from 25 countries perceived the group of migrants as more prototypical of the superordinate category “citizens of the world” than their national group (relative outgroup prototypicality), whereas no differences in prototypicality occurred for the category “humans.” Identification with “citizens of the world” was positively associated with a disposition to oppose helping migrants and to offer dependency-oriented help. However, identification with “humans” was positively associated with helping in general, and with offering dependency- and autonomy-oriented help; and negatively associated with opposition to helping. The experimental study manipulated the salience of “citizens of the world” vs. “humans” vs. control category, among 224 nationals from 36 countries. Results showed that the salience of “humans” (vs. “citizens of the world”) triggered higher entitativity and essentialist perceptions, and dual-identity representations. No differences due to salience were found for representations of relative ingroup prototypicality or helping responses. Overall, these findings suggest that the interchangeable use of different labels is problematic, considering these might activate different representations, and thus, are likely to lead, in some circumstances, to different attitudinal or behavioral outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Article number986075
Pages (from-to)1-21
Number of pages21
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Sept 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work was funded by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT, Portugal), with a grant/PhD studentship awarded to the first author (PD/BD/129601/2017), as well as supported, in part, by NSF Grant #1823763 awarded to the third author.

Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2022 Carmona, Guerra, Dovidio, Hofhuis and Sindic.

Research programs

  • ESHCC M&C

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Unpacking all-inclusive superordinate categories: Comparing correlates and consequences of global citizenship and human identities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this