Unrelated Future Costs and Unrelated Future Benefits: Reflections on NICE Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal

Alec Morton*, Amanda L Adler, David Bell, Andrew Briggs, Werner Brouwer, Karl Claxton, Neil Craig, Alastair Fischer, Peter McGregor, Pieter van Baal

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialAcademicpeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this editorial, we consider the vexing issue of 'unrelated future costs' (for example, the costs of caring for people with dementia or kidney failure after preventing their deaths from a heart attack). The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance is not to take such costs into account in technology appraisals. However, standard appraisal practice involves modelling the benefits of those unrelated technologies. We argue that there is a sound principled reason for including both the costs and benefits of unrelated care. Changing this practice would have material consequences for decisions about reimbursing particular technologies, and we urge future research to understand this better.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)933-938
Number of pages6
JournalHealth Economics
Volume25
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2016

Research programs

  • EMC NIHES-05-63-02 Quality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Unrelated Future Costs and Unrelated Future Benefits: Reflections on NICE Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this