Abstract
To the Editor,
Recently, there has been a global trend towards update of clinical guidelines concerning pregnancy diabetes. More specifically, guidelines are updated to decision limits proposed by the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) during the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) study [1]. In the HAPO study, cut-off values for the 75 g oral
glucose tolerance test were set based on clinical outcome of more than 25,000 pregnancies. In this time and era, it is common for medical professionals to adopt evidence based protocols. Unfortunately, verification whether local protocols for analysis and pre-analysis are functionally equivalent to those in the guidelines in order to make the decision limits valid for local
measurements is often overlooked. [...]
Recently, there has been a global trend towards update of clinical guidelines concerning pregnancy diabetes. More specifically, guidelines are updated to decision limits proposed by the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) during the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) study [1]. In the HAPO study, cut-off values for the 75 g oral
glucose tolerance test were set based on clinical outcome of more than 25,000 pregnancies. In this time and era, it is common for medical professionals to adopt evidence based protocols. Unfortunately, verification whether local protocols for analysis and pre-analysis are functionally equivalent to those in the guidelines in order to make the decision limits valid for local
measurements is often overlooked. [...]
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | e225-7 |
| Journal | Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Aug 2016 |
| Externally published | Yes |