US velocimetry in participants with aortoiliac occlusive disease

Stefan Engelhard*, Majorie van Helvert, Jason Voorneveld, Johan G. Bosch, Guillaume P.R. Lajoinie, Michel Versluis, Erik Groot Jebbink, Michel M.P.J. Reijnen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: The accurate quantification of blood flow in aortoiliac arteries is challenging but clinically relevant because local flow patterns can influence atherosclerotic disease. Purpose: To investigate the feasibility and clinical application of two-dimensional blood flow quantification using high-frame-rate contrast-enhanced US (HFR-CEUS) and particle image velocimetry (PIV), or US velocimetry, in participants with aortoiliac stenosis. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, participants with a recently diagnosed aortoiliac stenosis underwent HFR-CEUS measurements of the pre- and poststenotic vessel segments (August 2018 to July 2019). Two-dimensional quantification of blood flow was achieved by performing PIV analysis, which was based on pairwise cross-correlation of the HFR-CEUS images. Visual inspection of the entire data set was performed by five observers to evaluate the ability of the technique to enable adequate visualization of blood flow. The contrast-to-background ratio and average vector correlation were calculated. In two participants who showed flow disturbances, the flow complexity and vorticity were calculated. Results: Thirty-five participants (median age, 67 years; age range, 56–84 years; 22 men) were included. Visual scoring showed that flow quantification was achieved in 41 of 42 locations. In 25 locations, one or multiple issues occurred that limited optimal flow quantification, including loss of correlation during systole (n = 12), shadow regions (n = 8), a short vessel segment in the image plane (n = 7), and loss of contrast during diastole (n = 5). In the remaining 16 locations, optimal quantification was achieved. The contrast-to-background ratio was higher during systole than during diastole (11.0 6 2.9 vs 6.9 6 3.4, respectively; P , .001), whereas the vector correlation was lower (0.58 6 0.21 vs 0.47 6 0.13; P , .001). The flow complexity and vorticity were high in regions with disturbed flow. Conclusion: Blood flow quantification with US velocimetry is feasible in patients with an aortoiliac stenosis, but several challenges must be overcome before implementation into clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)332-338
Number of pages7
JournalRadiology
Volume301
Issue number2
Early online date24 Aug 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'US velocimetry in participants with aortoiliac occlusive disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this