Use of p53 immunohistochemistry can improve diagnostic agreement for differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN): an international reproducibility study

  • Shatavisha Dasgupta*
  • , Anne Sophie Van Rompuy
  • , Christine Bergeron
  • , Debra S. Heller
  • , Demaretta Rush
  • , Francoise Plantier
  • , James Scurry
  • , Jennifer Roberts
  • , Joost Bart
  • , Kathleen Lambein
  • , Katy Veprauskas
  • , Koen K. Van de Vijver
  • , Lex A.C.F. Makkus
  • , Loes Kooreman
  • , Maaike Bleeker
  • , Mahfooz Basha Mohamed
  • , Maria Angelica Selim
  • , Maria Carmen Rodriguez Alvarez
  • , Mieke R. Van Bockstal
  • , Noel Jean-Christophe
  • Patricia Guzman, Radhika Srinivasan, Rupali Arora, Russell Ball, Suzanne Wilhelmus, Senada Koljenović, Folkert J. van Kemenade, Patricia C. Ewing-Graham
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aims: 

Differentiated or HPV-independent vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN) can progress rapidly to invasive cancer and accurate pathological diagnosis is essential to facilitate appropriate interventions. Histological similarities of dVIN with non-neoplastic lesions, however, often make the diagnosis less reproducible. We investigated among a diverse group of pathologists whether the diagnostic agreement improves with the use of p53 immunohistochemistry (IHC) interpreted using the pattern-based schema. 

Methods and results: 

Fifty haematoxylin–eosin (HE) stained archival slides (30 dVIN and 20 non-dysplastic vulvar lesions) were selected and p53-IHC was performed. Twenty-four board-certified pathologists from eight countries first assessed the HE slides alone, and after a washout period, re-evaluated them alongside the p53-IHC slides. During both rounds, slides were diagnosed as dVIN, favour dVIN, favour no-VIN or no-VIN. p53-IHC was scored as wild-type or mutant (diffuse, basal, cytoplasmic or null). Kappa (κ) statistics and McNemar's test were used for statistical analyses. Overall diagnostic agreement for dVIN saw a significant increase in the Kappa value (κ = 0.6 vs. κ = 0.4, P = 0.002) when HE and p53-IHC slides were assessed together compared with histology assessment alone, although the level of agreement remained moderate. For p53-IHC assessment, overall agreement was substantial (κ = 0.7). Diagnoses changing from no-VIN/favour no-VIN to dVIN correlated significantly with the identification of a p53-mutant pattern (P < 0.001). 

Conclusions: 

Our findings indicate that p53-IHC is a robust ancillary tool that can be reproducibly interpreted by pathologists with varying experience levels and supports the routine use of p53-IHC in cases where dVIN is considered in the differential diagnosis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)414-428
Number of pages15
JournalHistopathology
Volume88
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Histopathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Use of p53 immunohistochemistry can improve diagnostic agreement for differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN): an international reproducibility study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this