Using Metamodeling to Identify the Optimal Strategy for Colorectal Cancer Screening

Hendrik Koffijberg*, Koen Degeling, Maarten J. IJzerman, Veerle M.H. Coupé, Marjolein J.E. Greuter

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
26 Downloads (Pure)


Objectives: Metamodeling can address computational challenges within decision-analytic modeling studies evaluating many strategies. This article illustrates the value of metamodeling for evaluating colorectal cancer screening strategies while accounting for colonoscopy capacity constraints. Methods: In a traditional approach, the best screening strategy was identified from a limited subset of strategies evaluated with the validated Adenoma and Serrated pathway to Colorectal CAncer model. In a metamodeling approach, metamodels were fitted to this limited subset to evaluate all potentially plausible strategies and determine the best overall screening strategy. Approaches were compared based on the best screening strategy in life-years gained compared with no screening. Metamodel runtime and accuracy was assessed. Results: The metamodeling approach evaluated >40 000 strategies in <1 minute with high accuracy after 1 adaptive sampling step (mean absolute error: 0.0002 life-years) using 300 samples in total (generation time: 8 days). Findings indicated that health outcomes could be improved without requiring additional colonoscopy capacity. Obtaining similar insights using the traditional approach could require at least 1000 samples (generation time: 28 days). Suggested benefits from screening at ages <40 years require adequate validation of the underlying Adenoma and Serrated pathway to Colorectal CAncer model before making policy recommendations. Conclusions: Metamodeling allows rapid assessment of a vast set of strategies, which may lead to identification of more favorable strategies compared to a traditional approach. Nevertheless, metamodel validation and identifying extrapolation beyond the support of the original decision-analytic model are critical to the interpretation of results. The screening strategies identified with metamodeling support ongoing discussions on decreasing the starting age of colorectal cancer screening.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)206-215
Number of pages10
JournalValue in Health
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright: © 2020 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research


Dive into the research topics of 'Using Metamodeling to Identify the Optimal Strategy for Colorectal Cancer Screening'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this