Utility value is key. Exploring factors that contribute to student motivation for effective cognitive learning strategies in higher education

Marloes Broeren*, Peter Verkoeijen, Lidia Arends, Guus Smeets

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Effective cognitive learning strategies are beneficial for learning and long-term retention. However, higher education students often rely on surface-level strategies like reading and underlining. Interventions to support effective cognitive strategy use have addressed knowledge, beliefs, planning, and commitment. This latter aspect and its relation with motivation has remained underexposed. Therefore, this study aimed to answer the following research question: What factors contribute to student motivation for effective cognitive strategy use during self-study in higher education? First-year vocational university students participated in focus group discussions (N = 100), and completed a strategy questionnaire (N = 217). Results showed that students used combinations of effective cognitive and surface-level strategies based on successful past experiences. Perceived utility value of strategies for students' performance-oriented goals contributed considerably to motivation, and students reduced perceived costs by combining self-study with non-academic activities. Incorporating these aspects in strategy support could be next steps for future interventions.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere4220
Number of pages11
JournalApplied Cognitive Psychology
Volume38
Issue number4
Early online date24 Jun 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Applied Cognitive Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Research programs

  • ESSB PSY

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Utility value is key. Exploring factors that contribute to student motivation for effective cognitive learning strategies in higher education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this