Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Vaccine market access pathways in the EU27 and the United Kingdom − analysis and recommendations for improvements

  • Valérie Laigle*
  • , Maarten J. Postma
  • , Mira Pavlovic
  • , Chiara Cadeddu
  • , Ekkehard Beck
  • , Anna Kapusniak
  • , Mondher Toumi
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Access Group
  • University of Groningen
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • Padjadjaran University
  • University Medical Centre Groningen
  • Medicines Development and Training (MDT) Services
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Creativ-Ceutical SARL
  • Aix-Marseille Université

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background:

Vaccine market access (VMA) pathways across the European Union (EU) and the United Kingdom (UK) are complex, lengthy, and heterogeneous, particularly when compared with pharmaceuticals. The knowledge base to inform recommendations for optimization of VMA is lacking. We therefore conducted a comprehensive evaluation of EU VMA pathways. 

Methods: 

Research in two phases included: (1) mapping VMA pathways in each EU member state (including the UK) based on a literature review, expert interviews, and mathematical archetyping; and (2) interviews with vaccine experts to identify barriers, drivers, and recommendations for regional VMA alignments. 

Results: 

Key steps in VMA across the EU include horizon scanning, early advice, National Immunization Technical Advisory Group (NITAG) recommendation for inclusion in national immunization programs, health technology assessment (HTA), final decision and procurement. We found significant complexity and heterogeneity, particularly for early advice, and in the roles, decision-making criteria, and transparency of NITAGs and HTA bodies. The most important drivers for rapid VMA included demonstration of disease burden and vaccine benefit (e.g., efficacy, safety, economic). Key barriers were budget limitations and complexity/clarity of VMA processes (e.g., need for national-regional consensus, clarity on process initiation, and clarity on the role of HTA). Recommendations for alignment at EU and member-state levels include information sharing, joint clinical assessment, initiatives to address funding and political barriers, and improved transparency by decision-making bodies. Early engagement with vaccine stakeholders was a key recommendation for manufacturers.

Conclusions: 

There is significant potential for alignment, collaboration, and improvement of VMA across the EU. Roles, responsibilities, and transparency of key bodies can be clarified. The COVID-19 pandemic response should stimulate policies to improve access to all vaccines, including routine ones, and form the foundation upon which a consistent vaccine ecosystem can be created for the EU, one that is resilient, consistent between member states, and fit for purpose.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5706-5718
Number of pages13
JournalVaccine
Volume39
Issue number39
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Sept 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Vaccine market access pathways in the EU27 and the United Kingdom − analysis and recommendations for improvements'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this