TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of Left Ventricular High Frame Rate Echo-Particle Image Velocimetry against 4D Flow MRI in Patients
AU - Han, Yichuang
AU - Bowen, Daniel J
AU - Barreto, Bernardo Loff
AU - Zwaan, Robert R
AU - Strachinaru, Mihai
AU - van der Geest, Rob J
AU - Hirsch, Alexander
AU - van den Bosch, Annemien E
AU - Bosch, Johan G
AU - Voorneveld, Jason
N1 - Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/10/15
Y1 - 2024/10/15
N2 - OBJECTIVE: Accurately measuring intracardiac flow patterns could provide insights into cardiac disease pathophysiology, potentially enhancing diagnostic and prognostic capabilities. This study aims to validate Echo-Particle Image Velocimetry (echoPIV) for in vivo left ventricular intracardiac flow imaging against 4D flow MRI.METHODS:We acquired high frame rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound images from three standard apical views of 26 patients who required cardiac MRI. 4D flow MRI was obtained for each patient. Only echo image planes with sufficient quality and alignment with MRI were included for validation. Regional velocity, kinetic energy (KE) and viscous energy loss (EL˙) were compared between modalities using normalized mean absolute error (NMAE), cosine similarity and Bland-Altman analysis.RESULTS: Among 24 included apical view acquisitions, we observed good correspondence between echoPIV and MRI regarding spatial flow patterns and vortex traces. The velocity profile at base-level (mitral valve) cross-section had cosine similarity of 0.92 ± 0.06 and NMAE of (14 ± 5)%. Peak spatial mean velocity differed by (3 ± 6) cm/s in systole and (6 ± 10) cm/s in diastole. The KE and rate of EL˙ also revealed a high level of cosine similarity (0.89 ± 0.09 and 0.91 ± 0.06) with NMAE of (23 ± 7)% and (52 ± 16)%.CONCLUSION: Given good B-mode image quality, echoPIV provides a reliable estimation of left ventricular flow, exhibiting spatial-temporal velocity distributions comparable to 4D flow MRI. Both modalities present respective strengths and limitations: echoPIV captured inter-beat variability and had higher temporal resolution, while MRI was more robust to patient BMI and anatomy.
AB - OBJECTIVE: Accurately measuring intracardiac flow patterns could provide insights into cardiac disease pathophysiology, potentially enhancing diagnostic and prognostic capabilities. This study aims to validate Echo-Particle Image Velocimetry (echoPIV) for in vivo left ventricular intracardiac flow imaging against 4D flow MRI.METHODS:We acquired high frame rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound images from three standard apical views of 26 patients who required cardiac MRI. 4D flow MRI was obtained for each patient. Only echo image planes with sufficient quality and alignment with MRI were included for validation. Regional velocity, kinetic energy (KE) and viscous energy loss (EL˙) were compared between modalities using normalized mean absolute error (NMAE), cosine similarity and Bland-Altman analysis.RESULTS: Among 24 included apical view acquisitions, we observed good correspondence between echoPIV and MRI regarding spatial flow patterns and vortex traces. The velocity profile at base-level (mitral valve) cross-section had cosine similarity of 0.92 ± 0.06 and NMAE of (14 ± 5)%. Peak spatial mean velocity differed by (3 ± 6) cm/s in systole and (6 ± 10) cm/s in diastole. The KE and rate of EL˙ also revealed a high level of cosine similarity (0.89 ± 0.09 and 0.91 ± 0.06) with NMAE of (23 ± 7)% and (52 ± 16)%.CONCLUSION: Given good B-mode image quality, echoPIV provides a reliable estimation of left ventricular flow, exhibiting spatial-temporal velocity distributions comparable to 4D flow MRI. Both modalities present respective strengths and limitations: echoPIV captured inter-beat variability and had higher temporal resolution, while MRI was more robust to patient BMI and anatomy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85206462728&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.09.012
DO - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.09.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 39414405
SN - 0301-5629
VL - 51
SP - 94
EP - 101
JO - Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
JF - Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
IS - 1
ER -