Validation of the PANAMA-Score for Survival and Benefit of Adjuvant Therapy in Patients with Resected Pancreatic Cancer After Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX

Ingmar F. Rompen, Thomas F. Stoop, Stijn Van Roessel, Eran Van Veldhuisen, Quisette P. Janssen, Adnan Alseidi, Alberto Balduzzi, Gianpaolo Balzano, Frederik Berrevoet, Morgan Bonds, Olivier R. Busch, Giovanni Butturini, Ammar A. Javed, Marco Del Chiaro, Kevin C. Conlon, Massimo Falconi, Isabella Frigerio, Giuseppe K. Fusai, Johan Gagnière, Oonagh GriffinThilo Hackert, Ernesto Sparrelid, Asif Halimi, Knut J. Labori, Giuseppe Malleo, Marco V. Marino, Michael B. Mortensen, Andrej Nikov, Mickaël Lesurtel, Tobias Keck, Jörg Kleeff, Rupaly Pandé, Per Pfeiffer, Daniel Pietrasz, Keith J. Roberts, Antonio Sa Cunha, Roberto Salvia, Oliver Strobel, Timo Tarvainen, Hanneke W.M. Van Laarhoven, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Martin Loos, Christoph Michalski, Marc G. Besselink, Thomas Hank*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aim: 

To validate the prognostic value of the PAncreatic NeoAdjuvant MAssachusetts (PANAMA)-score and to determine its predictive ability for survival benefit derived from adjuvant treatment in patients after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX 

Background: 

The PANAMA-score was developed to guide prognostication in patients after neoadjuvant therapy and resection for PDAC. As this score focuses on the risk for residual disease after resection, it might also be able to select patients who benefit from adjuvant after neoadjuvant therapy. 

Methods: 

This retrospective international multicenter study is endorsed by the European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (E-AHPBA). Patients with PDAC who underwent resection after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX were included. Mantel-Cox regression with interaction analysis was performed to assess the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Results: 

Overall, 383 patients after resection of PDAC following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX were included of whom 187 (49%), 137 (36%), and 59 (15%) had a low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk PANAMA-score, respectively. A discrimination in median OS was observed stratified by risk groups (48.5, 27.6, and 22.3 months, Log-Rank-Plow-intermediate=0.004, Log-Rank-Pintermediate-high=0.027). Adjuvant therapy was not associated with an OS difference in the low-risk group (HR 1.50, 95%CI:0.92-2.50), whereas improved OS was observed in the intermediate (HR 0.58, 95%CI:0.34-0.97) and high-risk groups (HR 0.47, 95%CI:0.24-0.94) (p-interaction=0.008). 

Conclusions: 

The PANAMA 3-tier risk groups (low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk, available via pancreascalculator.com) correspond with differential survival in patients with resected PDAC following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX. The risk groups also differentiate between survival benefit associated with adjuvant treatment, with only the intermediate- and high-risk groups associated with improved OS.

Original languageEnglish
Article number6650
Pages (from-to)852-860
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Surgery
Volume281
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jan 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of the PANAMA-Score for Survival and Benefit of Adjuvant Therapy in Patients with Resected Pancreatic Cancer After Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this